[A little drama among the uncles] [Spoilers]

Greekmilk: Looking at OP’s statements, most of them seem to be debunked.
1. Anaxa was basically only in flashbacks after 3.2 — to put it plainly, he’s really dead.
2. The first cycle wasn’t a total wipe. Even if you exclude Phainon, Dan Heng, the Trailblazer, and Mem, not everyone died.
3. The next Amphoreus arc isn’t in the next cycle, and it’s at least coming in 3.5. There’s no such thing as a “second-cycle Aquila».

Sanmao: You're the N-th person trying to debunk me. I hope you succeed. We'll see.

⸻

Greekmilk: Can I ask what “second cycle boss” is supposed to mean?

Sanmao: You didn’t know about the total wipe in 3.3? I usually refer to the time before that as the “first cycle.”
When we wake up again, it’ll be time to face the gaze of “Destruction” itself.

⸻

Greekmilk: So you believe the Aquila subjugation happened after 3.3?

Sanmao: I never said that — the wipe and the Aquila fight both took place in the same version.

⸻

Greekmilk: So you’re saying the Aquila subjugation battle happened after the wipe, during the second cycle?

No answer
⸻
#UncleSanmao #UncleGreekmilk